As times goes on,
advancements in technology and culture are made. Another thing that has noticeably changed in
the last couple decades is the extent to which athletes from high school to
professionals are training. I won’t try
to say that the all-stars of yesterday were not completely dedicated to their
respective sports and that’s why they’ve achieved success. What I will say, however, is that the
athletes of today are coming into the college and professional ranks as
physical freaks and specimen. This can
be attributed to the fact that children today see athletes put on a much higher
pedestal today than in the past due to the prevalence of the media around
sports. Because of this, people are
spending absurd amounts of time dedicating themselves to the field, weight
room, rink and what have you. In
addition to scholarship money, I don’t think that universities should be
allowed to pay their athletes. But what
I do think is that college athletes should be able to receive money for small
things they can do that are forbidden by the NCAA today.
The entire sports community has been put on notice of
every single step in the career of Heisman award winner and Texas A&M
quarterback Johnathan Manziel, also known as “Johnny Football”. In the saga that is Johnny’s collegiate
experience was one major story that blew up in early August of 2013. Johnny Manziel was being investigated just
before the season began for allegedly selling his autograph to an eBay dealer
who would then sell autographed memorabilia for a profit. The uninformed may see nothing wrong with
this situation, but the NCAA defines amateurism by not allowing “contracts with
professional teams, salary for participating in athletics, play with
professionals, benefits from an agent or prospective agent” and other similar
rules. Essentially the NCAA does not
want their student athletes receiving benefits (money) due to any success or
notoriety they may experience on the field of play.
Prior to this year, the NCAA could sell shirts
and jerseys with the names of student athletes on them for profit, certainly
near $100 for an authentic jersey. In
past years, the NCAA has subtly said that it is okay for them to make enormous
profits off of their NCAA athletes but that a player cannot sign a picture of
himself and receive even a penny for it.
Accordingly, after the Manziel investigation the NCAA removed licensed
apparel of member schools from their official fan shop, so to avoid the
hypocrisy that seems to linger with them in many cases. As an NCAA Division III athlete last year, I
could’ve signed a hat for a fan and if I even received something as
insignificant as a piece of chocolate soon after from the same person, I could
technically be investigated by the NCAA.
Student athletes barely even own their own signatures. They only own
them to the extent that they can sign an honor code statement before a
test. The fact that athletes like Johnny
Manziel cannot benefit in any way from having the kind of outbreak season that
he had is ridiculous.
Students
should be able to make all the money that they can as athletes. Not necessarily through agents and the like,
but rather through selling autographs and memorabilia. It’s only fair when they worked to earn every
bit of fame and popularity that they have.
Babe Ruth made his ascent to fame on a diet of beer and hot dogs, that
wouldn’t fly in the ultra-competitive environment that we see in college
athletics today. Student athletes devote
most of their days to their sport and deserve to be recognized and rewarded as
such. The NCAA needs to maintain
amateurism as part of their corporation but the least that they could do is
loosen the restrictions on student athletes receiving benefits.
I agree with you on the fact that the rules these days on athletes can be a little ridiculous if not downright stupid. The fact that students put their lives into doing what they love to do shouldn't stop them from earning money, even in the little parts. All I can really say is that times have changed, sometimes I think for the worse for student athletes.
ReplyDeleteThis is totally off topic, but I LOVE your background! Anyways, now on to the main point.. This is one of your editorials!! I read it today and it's kind of funny reading it again! I feel like I shouldn't say much because I made comments on your paper and then wrote you a paragraph. Wouldn't want to spoil the surprise hehe!! This is a very interesting topic you presented, and an argument that I haven't heard before. I like it!
ReplyDeleteThis is a hot topic in college sports today and you did a great job of explaining your points. In the past, I've agreed with the NCAA, but I'm moving more and more to your side as I read various articles or blogs such as this one. I think the NCAA doesn't want athletes benefiting from their name because it is unfair to the other students at their school. There are people at all universities that are talented at music, art, research, and many other things other than sports who probably never get asked for an autograph. Like I said, I'm torn on this topic right now so time will tell.
ReplyDelete